hmmm… what?
Okay, so I have, at this time, no better way to describe these people.
This morning, the first thing I saw in my email box was a trackback to my most recent entry (which, btw, I was on the way to make private). Visiting this site, I was presented with my whole entry, complete with every little word I wrote, every page I linked to. Looking at the bottom of the page for a comment form or contact information, I found one, but also found links to other entries of mine. It lists 440 total. They ripped off my whole site!
And not only this, but they plaster the website with Google ads. (Oh, trust me, as soon as I finish this post, I’m contacting Google. They also have a Gmail login box from their main page.)
Yes, they do link back to my site with the titles, but only because they stole my complete HTML and that’s what my site does: links to itself. And since they ripped off my complete HTML, they also have my Flickr photos on there. That, also, really ticks me off. Those photos are not to be used by anyone who’s not friend/family, and here they have not only stolen photos of my kid, but hotlinked them as well. Therefore, if I hadn’t been using Flickr for all my photos (or nearly all), they would be stealing my bandwidth as well. Along these lines, as well, they are violating Flickr’s terms by using these photos and not linking back to the photo’s page on Flickr as is required by the tos. They are also doing with Flickr photos from everyone what they are doing with blog content. They have a search where you end up searching Flickr photos and then each one has its own page at bitacle.org before you can get to the actual Flickr page. Furthermore, they want you to Digg the articles on bitacle.org rather than the real, true website. How sneaky/suspicious is that!?
Their “sitemap” is a list of sites they have ripped off with links to those posts within bitacle.org, not the true blog.
To top it all off? At the bottom of each page is a Creative Commons license! My blog is not Creative Commons, I have never said it was, I honestly never will. It’s my personal blog site, it is licensed All Rights Reserved and NO ONE has permission to reprint it, especially without asking, and especially in whole part like this!
There’s a “help” link at the bottom, that gives no help at all. Here’s what some of their questions, answers are (since they ripped off my content, I can rip off theirs):
#1 – What is ‘Bitacle Search Cache’?
‘Bitacle Search Cache’ it’s the specific technology for blogs developed by Bitacle.
Bitacle has faith in the autoedition publishing phenomenon that supposes the use of blogs. We hoped that ‘Bitacle Search Cache’ help our users to explore the universe of blogs of more effective way, and perhaps obtains that many users follow this revolution. As much if it’s looking for books, political commentaries, travels or any other thing. ‘Bitacle Search Cache’ allows you to find what the others think about any subject that you wish to inquire.
Our index of blogs is updated constantly to always obtain the most precise and updated results. In addition we look for blogs written in French, Italian, German, Spanish, Chinese, Korean, Portuguese, Japanese and other languages.
#3 – What type of blogs are inlcuded in the search?
All blogs that has a feed. This it can be RSS or Atom.
#7 – What happens if I don’t wish to appear in the list?
If you doesn’t publish feed, it won’t be included in the blog’s search. Nevertheless, if you previously has published feed of the site that was indexed, the old entrances will remain in the index, although the new ones aren’t added.
The blog search don’t follow the archives ‘robots.txt’ or META labels like NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW.
Reminiscent of Stalker Girl, these guys actually want me to block all search engines via Meta tags to keep out their sticky fingers? Ha, little do they know.
Solution?
Step #1, I emailed them (not from my “real” address):
It has come to the attention that you have ripped off content from my ENTIRE website, spoken-for.org. Some examples:
http://en.bitacle.org/blogs/viewblog/-txl7did0/440
http://en.bitacle.org/blogs/viewblog/-txl7did0/439
http://en.bitacle.org/blogs/viewblog/-txl7did0/1
The list goes on and on.
My blog is NOT Creative Commons and you did and do NOT have permission to reprint it. There’s a reason those posts can only be found at spoken-for.org – I WANT IT THAT WAY. You have also stolen my photos which are licensed All Rights Reserved and not allowed to be used by ANYONE, especially the likes of you.
This is your official notice to remove any and all of my posts, IMMEDIATELY, or I will be having a chat with your host and then taking legal action.
Thank you,
valerie
I doubt I’ll receive a response, of course.
Secondly, Owen has written me a little script and made some htaccess rewrite rules so that these idiot people should only be able to access a bad feed saying they’ve stolen information, etc. Thanks, Owen. :)
UPDATE: Check out Owen’s post on this, and if you’re a WordPress user, download his new plugin that will do the same thing I mentioned above for you!
For reference to you all out there, this is what was in my access logs:
212.22.59.251 – - [01/Sep/2006:09:17:08 -0400] “GET /feed/ HTTP/1.1″ 200 47584 “http://bitacle.org” “Bitacle bot/1.1″
212.22.59.251 – - [01/Sep/2006:18:16:23 -0400] “GET /feed/ HTTP/1.1″ 200 47591 “http://bitacle.org” “Bitacle bot/1.1″
212.22.59.251 – - [02/Sep/2006:04:19:21 -0400] “GET /feed/ HTTP/1.1″ 200 47961 “http://bitacle.org” “Bitacle bot/1.1″
212.22.59.251 – - [03/Sep/2006:03:43:18 -0400] “GET /feed/ HTTP/1.1″ 200 47570 “http://bitacle.org” “Bitacle bot/1.1″
212.22.59.251 – - [04/Sep/2006:03:42:23 -0400] “GET /feed/ HTTP/1.1″ 200 45858 “http://bitacle.org” “Bitacle bot/1.1″
212.22.59.251 – - [05/Sep/2006:17:14:47 -0400] “GET /feed/ HTTP/1.1″ 200 45098 “http://bitacle.org” “Bitacle bot/1.1″
212.22.59.251 – - [06/Sep/2006:14:18:32 -0400] “GET /feed/ HTTP/1.1″ 200 46540 “http://bitacle.org” “Bitacle bot/1.1″
212.22.59.251 – - [07/Sep/2006:02:48:09 -0400] “GET /feed/ HTTP/1.1″ 200 46568 “http://bitacle.org” “Bitacle bot/1.1″
See a pattern there? It goes on and on.
Has this happened to you? Do you want to keep them from stealing your content?
WordPress user? Install Owen’s AntiLeech plugin to take care of the likes of Bitacle for you!
Not a WordPress user? Try some of these solutions:
1. Block that IP address in your htaccess and redirect the bot to a 403 (Forbidden) page for your feed:
Put this in your htaccess:
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^212\.22\.59\.251$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Bitacle
RewriteRule .? – [F]
Thanks, Owen!
2. Block the bot via your robots.txt
I’m not exactly sure what the bot’s name is (I’m not too up on all this), but this should cover your bases:
User-agent: Bitacle bot/1.1
Disallow: /
User-agent: Bitacle bot
Disallow: /
User-agent: Bitacle
Disallow: /
If you’re new to robots.txt files and don’t already have one, just take that text there, put it in a blank txt file and save it to your site so that it is yoursite.com/robots.txt
NOTE: Regarding above, their FAQ #7, there seems to be some confusion on what exactly they mean… in English. At first I read it that they do listen to the robots.txt and such while others have interpreted it to mean the opposite (see comments). I have no idea what they truly mean, but it can’t hurt to try and block them there, can it?
3. Email Google Adsense
Here’s their standards for abuse emails:
1. Draft a new email. If possible, please use the email address currently associated with your AdSense account
2. Write ‘AdSense Policy Violation’ as the subject of your message
3. Please include all of the following in the body of your message:
— The URL of the violating website
— A description of the violation
— The specific location of the violation, if applicable
4. Send this email to adsense-abuse at google.com
This is basically what I sent to Adsense. A bit… choppy, but it gets the job done:
It has come to my attention that the site bitacle.org is ripping off content in whole from blogs and re-licensing it under Creative Commons. They took my complete website, images and everything, and reposted it though my blog is All Rights Reserved.
This site uses only stolen content and then has Google ads (adsense) plastered everywhere around this stolen content. There’s an adbar at the top (horizontal) and then a block towards the bottom by content forms. Look to http://en.bitacle.org/blogs/viewblog/-txl7did0/439 for an example.
They also have a Gmail address they are using in conjunction with this site and have a Gmail login box from their main page of bitacle.org. I’ve not tried this box. I am not aware if it is legitimate or if it just steals passwords, or both, etc.
I appreciate your attention to this matter as this is not acceptible in my book. As an adsense user myself – a legitimate one – I am very distressed to see sites like this that attempt to make money from other people’s hard work.
Thank you.
I’m sure I’ll be updating this post (or making more) as time goes on and things unfold. Share your steps of combating this, if you would – and let us know if you run across any other sites like Bitacle!
More (in no particular order):
- Digg it (hey, sweet, thanks guys :))
- asymptomatic.net/…help-defeat-the-sploggers-with-antileech
- tdjc.be/…bitacleorg-stealing-content/
- allanjenkins.typepad.com/…bitacle_thieves.html
- lutrov.com/blog/80
- stopbitacleorg.wordpress.com/
- theaterofthesoul.unitybiz.net/…all-your-blogs-are-belong-to-bitacle/
- monkeynotions.com/blog/…how-much-is-bitacle-biting/
- monkeynotions.com/blog/…and-the-bitacle-saga-continues/
- frenchysfracas.com/…onmymind20060922/
- frenchysfracas.com/…bitacle-and-splogs-final-thoughts/
- hollywood2020.blogs.com/….bitacle_debacle.html
- arb0rv1tae.typepad.com/…bite_me_bitacle.html
I'm Valerie, late 20's, from Missouri. I'm married... with children: a young boy and a baby girl. I enjoy many things including photography, candle making, videography, history, and mythology. Baby Girl was born 11 weeks early after my water was broken for 8 weeks - she's my little miracle - so you're bound to hear a lot about her progress here. I am also a second generation homeschooler, that's bound to come up as well.
Bes
September 21st, 2006 at 12.08 pm
My site’s been ripped too [thanks for showing me the ripped posts, Valerie]. Even the questions on their site are weird since they don’t explain anything!
One should get together with their hosts and have their servers confiscated.
Billy The Blogging Poet
September 21st, 2006 at 4.06 pm
Vallerie,
Somebody simply doesn’t understand RSS and Copyright law:
I checked my latest trackback from Bitacle and it looks like this. In other words: all Bitacle is displaying is what is is contained in my RSS feed. To see the entire post go here and you’ll notice that much of my post was actually lifted from the blog of another poet as is allowed by the “Fair Use” doctrine of United States Copyright Law.
To get a better understanding of copyright laws… well that was the link. You’ll find a primer and lots of links to good info. on copyright law.
Now, as you are a user of WordPress you do have complete control of your RSS feed content and can prevent Bitacle from displaying your entire post. Fact is: If Bitacle is displaying your entire post then so are several hundred other online RSS aggregators that just happen to be available online and free to anyone. I recommend you become more familier with WordPress as it’s a great tool as well as my personal second choice in blogging tools.
You complaints to Google will go nowhere as Bitacle is operating with the full knowledge and consent of Google.
Do you realize that because your RSS feed is publishing your entire post that hundreds, perhaps thousands of people are probably reading your every post through their desktop RSS readers without ever accessing your website? Why give away the entire cow when all they need is a cup of milk.
Victoria
September 21st, 2006 at 4.41 pm ♥
It’s scary that someone could do such a thing without asking for permission! Anyway, when I visited the bitacle.org site, it didn’t seem to be working – whatever I search for, it leads to an “internal server error” page.
Andreas
September 21st, 2006 at 4.49 pm ♥
Val: Thanks for your great tips on the .htaccess method.
Billy: Using RSS with a desktop or web based aggregator fine with me. But caching entire sites, mix them with context senstive ads while the originals posts are free, enabling visitors to comment without moderation (which in may have severe legal consequences in Germany) is not the purpose of content syndication. I do not see why anyone should limit the usefulness of a feed to prevent Bitacle from stealing content.
It is easy to prevent Google/Yahoo/MSN/[Insert robot of choice] from indexing parts of a site. So I consider it disrespectful and rude to create a crawler / robot that simply disobeys robots.txt.
Apologies for my English.
owen
September 21st, 2006 at 5.07 pm ♥
Billy: Your own copyright post contradicts everything you’ve said in your comment here.
Valerie owns the copyright to her written work, whether she spcifically says the work is copyrighted or not, which is published here just as it would be in a book or magazine. Republication (the “copy right”) can be granted only by the person to whom the copyright belongs, and it hasn’t been granted to Bitacle. Bitacle published her copyrighted work anyway, and so is in violation of copyright law.
I’m not sure why you would imply that publication via RSS indicates anything otherwise. Sure, there is more danger that if you publish something (a book, magazine, or blog) that someone will copy it. It doesn’t make Bitacle any less the perpetrator in this instance.
Moreover, copyright law is specific in its determination of fair use in that it can’t be used for monetary gain. I don’t see any point in Bitacle’s republication of Val’s work other than to make money off of what she has written.
A clearer violation of copyright could only be putting up another site that looked exactly like hers, content and all!
Val
September 21st, 2006 at 5.12 pm
Billy – I understand Copyright law, RSS, and Wordpress just fine, thanks. In fact, your page on copyright law agrees with everything I’ve said against bitacle!
It doesn’t matter what the trackbacks look like, what matters is that bitacle is taking ALL of my content and posting it again on their site with context ads, just as Andreas said. I should not have to change how my RSS feeds are handled because of them.
For instance, my neighbor across the street is free to open up her RSS reader and read my posts. If she doesn’t want to come to my site to leave a comment, so what? But just because she has access to my whole article from her desktop does not mean she is free to copy it, including images, post it on her site, and try to make money from it by selling ads, all while only offering me a meager, barely visible link back! It’s still my content and I still have a right to say who does what with it, who can use it and who can’t.
And per your own website, what bitacle is doing is not fair use, either, otherwise they’d not be posting the whole articles, would be putting the whole thing in quotes, would be giving a more obvious credit/link back, and, most importantly, would be asking me for permission!
And, again, when they re-post my content, they don’t just re-post it, they re-post it and tell the world that it’s under a Creative Commons license!
Bitacle is not acting as a simple RSS reader. No, they attempting to act as the blogs themselves. Otherwise, for one, there would be no reason for them to have comment forms on the posts, nor would the sites be chosen by Bitacle, they would be added to an individual’s user account one by one by that individual… just as a desktop reader.
This is not the first time I’ve come across this (though it is the first time my WHOLE site has been ripped) and every other time I’ve had the same reaction: get it taken down. Every other time, the purpose of the offending website has been to steal content to use for Google ads! Really, it’s a sneaky practice and I don’t know how anyone can condone it.
As for Google, we’ll just have to see what they say. If enough people complain, they may be inclined to change their minds.
Victoria – keep trying, refreshing. It’s loading for me now.
Andreas – thanks, I agree completely. And no need to apologize, your English is just fine!
Val
September 21st, 2006 at 5.13 pm
Whoops – Owen commented while I was typing mine. :) Yes, that is exactly what I mean! Bitacle is in absolute and blatant violation of copyright laws! There is no way around it.
hollyster
September 22nd, 2006 at 1.57 am ♥
Hi Val!
Thanks for posting all those helpful hints to blocking them. Completely agree that Bitacle is not a simple RSS Feed. i heard that its illegal (in the US) to dislay the entire post in a feed reader while contextual ads appear. If the reader just displays headlines then it’s okay to have ads in the reader. Bitacle is up to something fishy. First they clone netvibes. Then they are re-blogging other peoples content and making money off of it. There is now no reason to go that that blogger’s blog to continue/start the conversation….which bloggers love.
Jogy's weblog
September 22nd, 2006 at 2.58 am ♥
re: Aanklacht tegen Bitacle.org…
…
owen
September 22nd, 2006 at 6.44 am ♥
HA!
http://en.bitacle.org/blogs/viewblog/-txl7did0/441
I am so pleased with myself at the moment, I’m giggling.
hollyster
September 22nd, 2006 at 6.48 am ♥
That’s so awesome owen! heh!
Holly
Allan Jenkins
September 22nd, 2006 at 6.51 am ♥
I’ve also posted on the antics of these morons.
Owen, do you mind sharing the script you used? The PR/communication blogging community is likely to pick up my post, so it would be nice to show them workaround (which they might publicize widely enough to make Bitacle a laughing stock).
Allan
anneberit
September 22nd, 2006 at 7.29 am ♥
This is so not right!! We own our stuff, our words and photos! They should ask before copying, at least when they use the whole post.
Val
September 22nd, 2006 at 9.32 am
Yeah! That post makes me giggle, too, heehee. :-) Good work, Owen! Ohhh and I love that checkerboard pattern of their images! lmao!
And here is the permalink to Allan’s article on bitacle: allanjenkins.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/09/bitacle_thieves.html
Thanks for the comments everyone – let’s fry these morons, hahah. Die die die die! (Sorry, I had too much Mountain Dew last night and I’m still going on it…)
Marc
September 22nd, 2006 at 10.02 am
Thanks for this post! And thanks for the detailed info. I’ve blocked the two IP addresses.
Dutch Perspective
September 22nd, 2006 at 11.09 am ♥
Guest contribution to Forward…
Yesterday, I was a guest contributor at Forward Moving. I wrote about informal interviewing, a key instrument in the job search. Check it out on Forward.
Let’s just hope that the post won’t end up on Bitacle, a new site ripping posts in their entir…
drmike
September 22nd, 2006 at 4.13 pm
Anyone notice that the 72.* IP address is a Verizon dial up line?
owen
September 22nd, 2006 at 4.16 pm ♥
Val,
72.78.117.236 is probably the IP I was using yesterday when I was testing the script. It’s in Verizon’s netblock, which verifies that.
You might want to remove that IP from the list. ;)
drmike
September 22nd, 2006 at 4.45 pm
Owen, it’s mentioned in the article up there. You may want to get it removed from there.
timethief aka the spam dragon
September 22nd, 2006 at 4.47 pm ♥
Thanks to another wordpress blogger yesterday we became aware of these thieving parasites. I checked my own feeds today and sure enough I have been bitacled too.
Thanks to drmike we became aware of your blog post today. I’m really sorry for what they did to you Val (Valerie is the Roman clan name that means “brave” or “courageous” so hang in there).
Thanks to owen they have now been banned by drmike and we are currently leading a campign to have them banned and blocked from wordpress.com.
May these lowlives from hell all develop huge boils on their asses and their noses. (OOPS! I guess I drank too much de-caffeinated green tea today.)
Joyce Schwarz
September 22nd, 2006 at 7.25 pm ♥
Hi folks, it happened to me too. Did anyone notice that most of these posts about complete rip-off of blogs started yesterday or today. Most everyone’s are listed for September 21 or 22? So far, I have seen no NEWS COVERAGE on this — no CNET article, nothing on DIGG.com, nothing in the SAN JOSE MERCURY nor coverage by some of the hottest blogs ie Boing Boing etc. Why is that? I wrote about this in big headlines today. One of the things you can do if you’re a blogger who is not into HTML etc and just using templates like Typepad is to make sure you only RSS excerpts of your work NOT the complete posts. I’ve changed my settings ASAP –thanks to reading about this on another blog that was ripped off. I also notified the PR Dept at Six Apart. A great gal Kimberly took some action and I got a reply a few hours later from the GM of Six Apart — who basically said — to do what I had already done– to only post excerpts or make my whole blog private. What WAS a bit amazing is that the PR Dept @ Six Apart had not heard of Bitacle? I can’t believe I was the first blogger to contact the company. Maybe the rest just emailed in help queries…it took until 4 p.m. to get an answer to my help query and that was the second one I sent– the first one never heard back on. I think this deserves better media attention. What about setting up a site like BITACLE BYTES THE DUST or something like that a corporate complaint site — and aggregate these comments– there is power in numbers?? js
Allan Jenkins
September 22nd, 2006 at 7.44 pm ♥
I argue strongly against the “short feed” option, even if sploggers steal your stuff.
First of all, few have the patience to follow a “short feed” blog. I follow about 1200 blogs, which is average among my peers. Yeah, I check the headlines and summaries first, but if I have to “click” to the full story — forget it.
Second, “you got to click through to my blog to read the whole thing” blogs are ad driven. And, 99% of the time, pure BS. Written by people who think there’s a quick buck in having a weblog.
Just a thought.
Frenchy's Fracas
September 22nd, 2006 at 7.50 pm ♥
Bitacle, or how a small swarm can start…..
Bitacle.org – blog content thieves? These guys use your rss feed and display them on their site with Google Ads, making money of your content while telling you it’s all about archiving your site.. smart monkeys, but there’s some rising diss…
Joyce Schwarz
September 22nd, 2006 at 8.00 pm ♥
Well, Allen, thanks for that input– you’d think the Manager of Six Apart might have mentioned that too. My concern is where does this stop? What if a porn aggregator comes along– they decide to take your blog and everyone else’s and intersperse R or even X rated words inside your post. Unless, you control your blog technology HTML and coding –you’re a sitting duck at one of these template sites…and you (me etc) we pay monthly. I’m assuming no one has gotten a response from Google Adwords?? Why is there no PRESS COVERAGE on this Binacle? I just checked almost every search engine– there is not 1 NEWS article or even a blog about Binacle listed in the NEWS section of Google, Yahoo, MSN etc. This appears to have started this week– the mass scraping of the blogs. YET…not a story about it or Binacle by a major news source. Do we just have to sit and wait until some big time blogger or corporate blog gets hit and then there will be some action? Maybe, I’m naive, but I thought Web2.0 was about power of the people. Has anyone heard from any of the leagle beagles about this. WIPO meets next week in Geneva. Belgium sure had a thing to say about Google. Why can’t we do a class action suit?
Joefish
September 22nd, 2006 at 8.58 pm
I found out only yesterday that Bitacle has been scraping me. They’ve got 285 of my posts. I threw up a quick .htaccess rule to block their bot by UA and now I’m experimenting with solutions to track my content and to serve alternates for known scrapers like Bitacle. I’m very curious to read about what turns out to be your ultimate solution.
Also, I think you may have misinterpreted the Bitacle FAQ. I read number 7 as “we ignore robots.txt and meta rules, so don’t bother.”
John
September 22nd, 2006 at 10.49 pm ♥
Bitacle is a reader of feed for web.
http://www.nytimes.com/services/xml/rss/nyt/HomePage.xml
http://en.bitacle.org/blogs/viewblog/xhyuqltf0/7624
http://bitacle.org/about/en/aboutbitacle.html#whichblogs
As it´s:
http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=70179
You request excuse to bitacle ;-)
Akufu
September 23rd, 2006 at 4.37 am ♥
re: What is this about??…
…
Jacques
September 23rd, 2006 at 5.05 am
As a response to bitacle.org’s practices, a ’stopblog’ with the name ‘Stop bitacle.org from stealing weblog content!’ was created at http://stopbitacleorg.wordpress.com/
There’s a ‘Stop bitacle.org from stealing weblog content! button available too. Every contribution to this stopblog is appreciated. Please contact the admin if you have something to contribute.
Let’s pull the plugs on these “bastards”!
drmike
September 23rd, 2006 at 9.25 am
Actually it’s on digg.
I think best bet would just be to block them at the IP level.
Joe
September 23rd, 2006 at 9.44 am ♥
Hi,
Your not the only site that has been stolen from. I know you said that there were other sites, but the main page. IS a complete copy of netvibes.com, I also sent netvibes an email saying that their site was copied (probbaly) also.
TechZ
September 23rd, 2006 at 10.58 am
Hi Valerie, do you know of any way to find out if you’ve been ‘Splogged’ other than for finding out by a stroke of luck? Thanks for sharing your entire debacle, I’m sure alot of people who’ve been splogged will know what to do.
Sylvia
September 23rd, 2006 at 5.57 pm
Another thing to do is to complain to the Public Interest Registry which is in charge of .org domains. Tell them of Bitacle’s abuses and ask them to revoke the domain.
rrcatto
September 23rd, 2006 at 10.08 pm ♥
Valerie, you write like a girl – all frothy indignation. :o)
The cease and desist email you sent to bitacle included a personal insult (“especially the likes of you”), which serves only to annoy them and make them less willing to co-operate with your request. It even annoyed me and I don’t even know you! :o)
How about you calm your rhetoric down? Next you’ll be advocating the invasion of Europe like a certain little man with a short mustache. :-)
Essentially, you make no logical sense. You publish content to the Internet and then are surprised when others grab it and re-use it. What’s up with that, girl? :-)
Has the phrase “all rights reserved” stopped people from copying and sharing music?
The RIAA has waged war on file sharers and in the process done its own public image much harm.
How about you accept that whatever you publish online is gonna be used by others, if they find it interesting / valuable?
Basically, quit your bitching! :o)
You PUBLISH an RSS feed and then you’re surprised when people mirror your site’s contents.
Go read the Creative Commons licenses too – you may actually find a license which describes how you want to protect your work.
The bottom line, though, is that if there is some content you only wish to share with some people, then you will need to use a system that sets up access rights, so you can make “friends only” posts. Perhaps that is what you need to do?
Personally, I find those private networks unappealing. Whatever I write and publish, I want everyone to be able to access, copy, republish etc.
If they think they can make cash off “pay-per-click” from the doggerel I spew, good luck to them! :o)
Cheers,
Richard Catto
Mobile phone: +27 83 471 4795
Heathfield, Cape Town
South Africa
rrcatto
September 23rd, 2006 at 10.09 pm ♥
Valerie, how about Google?
Are they also in violation of copyright law?
and archive.org?
they copy your content and store it.
Google caches your site and returns excerpts of it in response to search queries – PLUS they serve ads against your content.
And Google allows people to view a cached page of a web site in their index.
Is this all a violation of copyright?
Are you going to be the activist which starts a Class Action suit against Google?
If so, consider me your opposition. I will fight you tooth and nail, because if people like you kick up enough stink and get your way, you will only succeed in breaking the Internet.
Find some other cause to bitch about – maybe homeless Spanish poodles?
Cheers,
Richard Catto
Cape Town, South Africa
Val
September 23rd, 2006 at 10.19 pm
Dear rrcatto,
Thanks, but your logic is full of holes yourself and I’m not even going to try and deal with your idiocy except to say one thing. You said:
Smiley face or no, that comment really offends me and all things aside, I really don’t see what that has to do with anything, how that can prove any of your points. So, my logic is faulty to you? Big freaking deal. How exactly does that equate me to Hitler? I want one website to die, that happens to be Spanish, so I must want to kill all of Europe. Hmmm. Interesting. Thanks for the psycho analysis, but no thanks. If you ever visit again, I shall expect an apology.
owen
September 23rd, 2006 at 10.22 pm ♥
rrcatto: There are many people who think Google violates this same principle. But of course, Google is actually useful for search, so people don’t mind. Bitacle seems useful for nothing but making them money by advertising on top of stolen content. The “service” they provide is the same service provided by all the sites they steal from – publishing content.
Additionally, I think many visitors have explained how copyright law works, and how any writing is immediately protected. It doesn’t matter whether the content is easy to copy or not, and crazily enough, the law is pretty well uniform planet-wide. The RIAA has a simple right to sue whoever violates the copyright of their artists by sharing files. What’s heinous about the RIAA is that they sue indiscriminantly without understanding the technology. This is nothing like the issue with Bitacle.
When you draw your comparisons in the future, try to come up with something vaguely analogous.
jenny
September 23rd, 2006 at 10.34 pm ♥
wow thats sick. why the hell would people stoop so low. i installed the plugin. ima block the IP too. hopefully this doesnt happen to me. KICK THEIR ASSES!!
Jacques
September 24th, 2006 at 3.33 am
At this very moment, trying to reach http://bitacle.org/ results in a ‘this page contains no data’ message from my browsers.
Could it be that the people from bitacle.org came to their senses?
hex
September 24th, 2006 at 4.04 am
rcatto,
you’re a douchebag. stealing content is stealing… just like murder is murder… or is it justified because you’re an idiot?
Bes
September 24th, 2006 at 5.15 am
Thanks for bringing attention to this Valerie. I’m glad you told me about this, otherwise I wouldn’t have known that they’re copying my site also.
I’ve just implemented the htaccess and robots.txt commands, and am going to use Asymptomatic’s plugin also.
frenchy!
September 24th, 2006 at 6.19 am
Alas Jacques,
The http:// en dot bitacle dot org still works and sends you to the spanish version of the site :(
Our South-African friend is being downright Internet-Silly ™..
Jacques
September 24th, 2006 at 8.42 am
Aaaah, how disappointing! Then we’ll have to wait a bit longer for our bytes to get through those Spanish pants! ;o)
Our South-African friend? He just a Virtual Opportunist ®, not our friend! At least not mine he is.
Val
September 24th, 2006 at 4.15 pm
Yes, in response to some who have commented that I may have interpreted their FAQ #7 wrongly, it does seem that they are pretty much saying, “we don’t follow the rules, so don’t bother.” It’s hard to say. But even if they are not saying that, it’s clear that they do not follow the robots.txt or meta tags, etc, as they should. They are pretty much saying, “well, you publish, so we are free to steal and there’s nothing you can do about it.”
Also, I guess I should have been taking screenshots all along but it appears that they’ve changed a few things on their site. I’ve been reading reports that Google ads are no longer appearing within the comments like before. I can’t testify to this as I’m not that perceptive, but I did notice underneath my title on Bitacle there is now the permalink to whatever entry was swiped. They are, however, still hotlinking images and not keeping the code that was originally in my post, the link back to Flickr. Then at the bottom of the posts, right side, it says, “Articles are copyright their respective authors.” Well, if that’s the case (and it is) what continues to make Bitacle think what they are doing is okay?
I am still counting three blocks of ads surrounding my posts for a total of nine individual ads. And you know what the kicker is? Every single one of the ads on this page I am looking at advertises candles… this is thanks to MY post in which I talk about MY candle business and website. Isn’t that just special? My content talking about my candles is being used to advertise my competitors!!!
Oh, and in response to TechZ’s comment, I really have no other idea how to know you are being stolen from by these guys except that you check your referral logs and stats often. A great script for referral logs is from textism.com/tools/refer, I use it on practically all my sites. Just make sure you don’t pubish the link to it or click to unknown sites or it will get spammed! All that and when you do find a bad site, you could search it for keywords unique to you or your address, etc., and often search Google for the sites that link to you. Maybe someone else out there has some better ideas…
Allan Jenkins
September 24th, 2006 at 4.20 pm ♥
I’ve posted a bit of a sum up on my blog:
http://allanjenkins.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/09/bitacle_splogge.html
Please go there with comments that you may have already published here, if you have time: I reach a Danish audience, but also an international PR/communication audience. They might not be tracking your blogs.
I can also report that Bitacle has made the tactical mistake of scraping Robert Scoble, according to the WordPress internal forums.
Allan
Val
September 24th, 2006 at 6.06 pm
In case anyone is interested and doesn’t already know about this website, here’s a new/similar one: aboutus.org. I just posted about it: http://spoken-for.org/archives/2006/09/24/1687/, do check it out. These guys are creating a “wiki” of websites and I’ve seen more than one friend’s phone number and address (as well as Google map of) listed without their knowledge or permission.
Ivan
September 24th, 2006 at 11.09 pm ♥
Val,
Adding the bitacle bot to “robots.txt” is NOT going to work because their bot bypasses it. A better way, assuming Apache is your webserver of choice, is to add this to your .htaccess file:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Bitacle \bot [NC]
RewriteRule ^.* - [F,L]
Sylvia
September 25th, 2006 at 1.35 pm
I noticed another change on Bitacle this morning. They removed all the images from my posts on their site. Interesting because one of my complaints is that they stripped the links (if present) off my images.
They also stopped scraping my site. Whether that’s because I complained or because I stopped feeding full posts, I don’t know.
TechZ
September 25th, 2006 at 2.29 pm
I believe ajay d’souza blogged about aboutus.org and even got responses from them, check it out here.
Thanks Val, I guess you’re right, check referer logs is about the only way right now.
Jacques
September 26th, 2006 at 12.54 am
Anybody familiar with http://www.kinja.com/ ?
Randy Charles Morin
September 27th, 2006 at 9.18 am ♥
Just report their AdSense violation, that’ll finish them off. Instructions here.
http://www.kbcafe.com/spam/?guid=20060927070530
Val
September 27th, 2006 at 9.53 am
Yes, there are many people who have already contacted Google – no results yet, but we are working on it! I will check out your link, too, thank you.
Dreamcore
October 2nd, 2006 at 7.53 pm ♥
You have a very nice site. I am so sorry to hear about what these assclowns are doing over at bitacle.org. I took a look via the links you posted, a new truly all time low. :(
Truth
October 30th, 2006 at 10.29 pm ♥
Oh boo f***** hoo.
Truth
October 30th, 2006 at 10.31 pm ♥
God forbid they republish the site you make $2 a month on. Oh noes!
Val
October 31st, 2006 at 11.03 am
Dear “Truth” – you’re a moron. I make a heck of a lot more than $2 a month on this site, k, thanks. But all that aside, if I made nothing from this site, I still would not want my content being republished as I want to retain full control over it! Maybe if you ever did something in your life worth anything you’d understand this.
Randy Charles Morin
October 31st, 2006 at 11.20 am ♥
It doesn’t matter how much you make on blogging, Bitacle is stealing content. It’s your content. Whether you make $0, $2 or $1000 per month is irrelevant.
Anonymous
February 4th, 2007 at 12.22 am ♥
‘truth;’ is probably a piece of shit troll or POS spammer himself
Val
February 5th, 2007 at 10.11 pm
Yes. “Truth” has no idea what he is talking about. He is probably bitacle’s owner. :P
Joe
February 5th, 2007 at 11.09 pm ♥
5 emails later (both to Bitacle and Google) and no replys. And 2 blog posts I hope I sent the message too. :D
Three Sticks - www.mosesedwardmilesiii.com
February 9th, 2007 at 11.04 pm ♥
My First Experience with Splogging (Spam Blogging or Stealing Blog Content)…
Tonight has been an interesting night. Tonight I published a much delayed article, Joining the Open Source Tidal Wave: Part 2, and I was quite pleased with myself for getting it out. I published like I normally do, I sent trackbacks to articles that …
Seven Deadly Sins of Bloggers at spoken for
February 15th, 2007 at 9.17 pm ♥
[...] Splogging [...]
note to getapodcast.com and download11.com at spoken for
April 3rd, 2007 at 12.44 pm ♥
[...] like Bitacle, these sites will now be getting fake content. These icons link to social bookmarking sites where [...]
My first DMCA at spoken for
June 29th, 2007 at 11.12 am ♥
[...] Today or Bes. Jonathan was so kind as to send me a template for the notice back when all that Bitacle stuff was at its height. I’m a little ashamed to admit that I never got around to sending one [...]
Rxbbx Blog Getting sick of Bitacle?
December 5th, 2007 at 5.55 am ♥
[...] Prevention: – Stop Bitacle – Spam + Blogs = Trouble – Help Defeat the Sploggers with AntiLeech – Those Bastards!! (bitacle.org) – Are Bitacle blog thieves too? – Bitacle splogger scam update: some thoughts – Bitacle blocker [...]
Help Defeat the Sploggers with AntiLeech - Asymptomatic
December 12th, 2007 at 6.49 pm ♥
[...] an online conversation yesterday with an acquaintence of mine. She was alarmed to have found that her entire site’s content had been republished by some other [...]