A&E v. Robertson, Phil

20 Dec 2013 In: Days Go By

Ok, here’s the thing.

Do I believe Phil has the right to believe what he wants and express those beliefs?  Especially when being asked flat-out while on his own time?  Yes.

Do I believe that A&E can fire him if he violates his contract?  Yes.

Did he violate his contract?  We don’t know.  Though I find it hard to believe that a man such as this would sign a contract that would limit what he’s allowed to say on his own time, especially when you consider that during the initial negotiations for the creation of Ducky Dynasty, we are told that they said three things were not negotiable: faith, family, and duck season.  (Hence all the shirts that list the same three things.)

So what is this?

I believe it’s a ploy on the part of A&E to appear that they are just, like, so amazing.  They squash discrimination when it rears its ugly head!!  However… in trying to do so, they have instead discriminated against one man for his religious beliefs.

Is anyone really so put out by what he said?  Really?  Does it affect you in any way?  Does the gay man down the street really need to care what some guy a million miles away thinks?  I think the answer here is a big resounding no.  Big deal, there are bigger fish in life that need to be fried.  Maybe we should all start with human sex trafficking, now that is something to get angry about.  Why is A&E so concerned about his statements that, as a side note, were clearly not complete as it’s obvious he fell into a trap set by GQ.  Because, you know, GQ is so reputable.

But I digress. There we are, back to he beginning – do they have the right to fire -or suspend- him for his religious beliefs?

I’ve been watching this unfold from my computer, I’ve not watched television or any mainstream reports on this whole broohaha, it’s pretty much just been all my Facebook feed.  The thing I keep seeing is people who are saying that free speech only applies when you’re dealing with the government.  Well, if that is so, then why do we have all these laws to guard against discrimination?  You’re not supposed to be able to fire someone based on their religious views.  Or their sexual preference.  Or their skin color.  Or if pink is their favorite color.  Or if you just plain don’t like their face.

So why is it okay for A&E to do it?

Back to the questions.

Do I think Phil and his family really care about his suspension?  No.  They don’t need A&E.  They already had a successful business going and a following — yes, we were fans before Duck Dynasty when it was just Duck Commander and Buck Commander, and I gotta tell you, those were the only hunting shows I would watch (since I am subjected to hunting shows on a regular basis) that didn’t make me want to bash my head in — and now?  It’s even bigger.  Filled with people who are raging mad that Phil has been discriminated against for voicing his beliefs and opinions.  The family has made a statement that if he’s off the show, so are they.  I’m sure there’s another network just waiting to snap them all up.  I think the family has a “mission accomplished” attitude about the show in general.  I believe that they weren’t in it for entertainment or money, that they were in it to subtly, and in their own way, spread their belief system.  That they have done, and now it’s even bigger because people who don’t even watch the show are talking about them and checking out the show to see what it’s all about.

Do I think A&E shot themselves in the foot?  Yes.  I mean, come on.  Rappers and others get away with this crap all the time, why is Phil so special?  I guess A&E is just incapable of looking ahead to consider the consequences.  Duck Dynasty is the highest rated show on cable.  You’d think they’d want to do anything they can to keep it while it’s hot.  It would not have been that hard for A&E to instead release a statement that Phil’s views are his own, and not that of the network.  Not only does everyone already know that (I mean, come on, duh) but stations and networks do that all the time with infomercials.  But right now, A&E is getting what it wants: attention through controversy.  I think in the end, they might regret it, I don’t see this making their network stronger.  Rather than just let people know that they don’t agree, and sat down with him over coffee to explain that you just don’t do interviews with people like GQ, they essentially attempted to silence him.  Attempting to silence someone never works.  I think in the end, the one that comes out ahead is the underdog, the one seen as being persecuted – – Chick-fil-A, need I say more?

Here’s the other thing, I cannot begin to tell you how many posts I’ve seen from gay people (that I don’t know) that start with, “I’m gay and I support Phil Robertson…”  Or, “really, we gays don’t care, it’s the media and the activists that blows these things out of proportion.”  Or even things like, “Who is Phil Robertson and why should I care what he said?”  My own gay friends and family have been silent on the issue so far (estranged straight family is a different story, for some reason they seem to think it makes them amazing and cool to be gay activists rather than living their own lives, but again, I digress).  Of course I know not all those who are gay feel this way but that’s the beauty of this world – we are all allowed to be different, to believe different, to think different, to speak different if we so choose.

So with all of that behind me…  who cares?  Phil doesn’t care what you think.  If he cared what you think, he’d have lied through his teeth.  A&E clearly does care what people think, and that is their downfall in this case.   But I think they’ll get by.  I don’t see Phil and his family as the suing for discrimination type so I’m sure A&E will have less to answer for than if they’d tried to silence someone else.

But you…  don’t you have more important things in life to deal with than worrying about one person out of 7 billion said?  I know I do.  I just thought I’d kill a half hour while my daughter’s in speech therapy but now it’s time to get back to reality.

year of the weddings and firsts

13 Nov 2013 In: Days Go By

Julian & Corrinne I’m no big time photographer, of course, but in moving some of my latest edited photos to the backup drives, I noticed that I’ve broken my record for weddings shot in a year and by a good percentage, when compared to previous years.  That’s pretty cool.  Hopefully next year will end up seeing at least one more.  It’s certainly not something I want to do every weekend, but an average of one every three weeks would be nice.  Which reminds me that I’ve broken two other personal records – two weddings in one weekend (in September) and most recently, three weddings in three weeks.  Fall is a good time for a wedding, I really like the outdoor fall weddings a lot.  Oh, earlier this year I was supposed to have two weddings in a single day, however, it didn’t work out in the end.  Probably best that way, it probably would have killed me!  :P  Of course, this slows down my turn-around time when you mix this with all the family sessions and what-nots going on, but I’m still doing pretty good with getting the images to clients in a timely manner.  This wedding I just finished editing was 3 Saturdays ago, not half bad, not the two weeks I’m used to, but not bad at all.  The next one should edit up quicker, then I can concentrate on my last one which will probably take longer than both of these as it was just plain a longer day.

But let’s see…  some other facts from this year…

First weddings shot at some key locations that I’ve always wanted to shoot a wedding at.

First wedding where I needed someone to translate (language) for me during family photos.

A wedding I can describe as a country Pinterest wedding (very cute).

My most glamorous wedding so far.

First time I second-shot for someone else.

First Catholic wedding that wasn’t a Mass (I didn’t even know they could do that).

First wedding where I had to practically force a bride and groom to do family photos and a (very shot) bridal session.  ;-)

First time I saw a child from a previous relationship participate in the symbolism of “two becoming one” (a sand pouring).

First weddings I hired assistant(s) for some help and second shooting.

First weddings I used off-camera lighting with flashes and transceivers.

First print-on-demand photo booth wedding (talk about busy fun).

First wedding where my couple faced their friends and family during the ceremony with the priest’s back to the audience.  (The same Catholic ceremony.)

First catered reception (believe it or not, all before have either been buffet, no reception, or cake and punch receptions) AND first reception where they had a high enough regard for me to actually assign me to a table with guests for the meal.

The hottest wedding ever on the hottest day of the year.

The first time I had a bride and groom ride off in a horse-drawn carriage.

First non-reception wedding where I got to use that time instead as a date with my husband.  (No charge to customer, of course, lol.)

I’m sure I could come up with more really random and insanely boring wedding facts, but my files are done copying, so now it’s back to work!

(I’d also like to add that it’s really helped having cable internet as opposed to the DSL I used to have…  wow, what used to take me all night of leaving the computer running now takes 20 minutes!)

pages to watch…? uh, no…

24 Oct 2013 In: Days Go By

If you have a Facebook page, you’ve probably seen the new section “Pages to Watch” by now.  The description is, as follows:

Track the progress on any Pages you want to watch. You’ll see how many likes they get so you can keep up.

You can add three pages (at least I can add three) that you can watch the progress of so you can compare yourself to them.  As if we needed another reason to be paranoid about how many people like us or don’t like us.  I know a lot of people take great pride in how many likes they have to a page, or even how many friends they have, etc.; as far as likes go, I tend to see this a lot with photographers.  I’ve seen some, frankly,  very bad photographers (aka fauxtographers) who have clearly paid to have likes.  Their work just does not correlate to having over 2,000 people who are interested enough to like their page and receive updates from them.

I am choosing not to use this feature because I just simply don’t need to compare myself to anyone else.  I have my own style of photography that is all me and the only person I want to compare myself to is myself, one year ago.  Or six months ago, whatever.  I am me and I’m gonna stay that way.

Now… Facebook, Darling… it would be nice if I could say what I want to be in that box so I could fill it with something that’s actually useful to me.  Just saying!

moiI'm Valerie and this is where I talk about random things as well as what interests and keeps me occupied: photography, digital scrapbooking, crochet for fun and sale, Origami Owl (see below), or whatever else I feel like! I'm the mother of two, including a preemie who's now a toddler diagnosted with apraxia (of speech), a wife of one, and a second generation homeschooler.

Flickr PhotoStream

    Deanna Easter 2014 Kayleigh Avina Selena, Stella, Jake Sara

Maybe Related?

Handmade Holifield Etsy

No items to display

Recent Scrapbook

View All Scrapbooking


Some Stuff


  • Follow Me on Pinterest